Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-16 09:47:49

Rogier van Dalen <rogiervd_at_[hidden]> writes:

> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:32:46 -0500, Doug Gregor <dgregor_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Why not keep all of the Boost versions in namespace boost, but create a
>> boost::tr1 namespace that has the appropriate using declarations for
>> the std versions (when a TR1 implementation is available) or the Boost
>> versions (when a TR1 implementation is not available). If we're feeling
>> really brave we could eventually call the boost:: versions deprecated
>> :)
> What is the policy anyway with regards to boost components that are in
> TR1? Are their interfaces now fixed to the TR1 ones?


Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at