From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-18 10:54:50
Daniel James wrote:
> Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> In fact, I get a similar error for the example code in your mail:
>> overloaded.cc: In member function `ResultType
>> GENERATE_DETAIL::foo_overloaded_t<ResultType>::operator()() const':
>> overloaded.cc:7: error: no matching function for call to `foo()'
>> overloaded.cc:4: note: candidates are: void foo(int)
>> overloaded.cc:5: note: void foo(char*)
>> So although I can see uses for this, I can't use it :-)
> Oh dear. I hadn't tested it very thoroughly - it works on g++ versions
> 2.95 and 3.3, but not 3.4 (which I guess you're using).
And intel fails in strict mode as well. I've attached a quickly fixed
version, which doesn't support nullary functions. I've also changed the
interface to specify the object's name so that you can call
Your example now becomes:
GENERATE_OVERLOADED(int, std::tolower, tolower_overloaded)
std::transform(s.begin(), s.end(), s.begin(),
Which seems to work okay, and is probably a little better.
Thanks for the feedback,
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk