Re: [boost] Boost 1.32 vs. tru64cxx65

From: Richard Hadsell (hadsell_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-23 10:52:55

John Maddock wrote:

> I believe we are assuming that your platform has an <inttypes.h> 
> header (our test machines for that platform do so), if yours does not 
> then you may need to stop BOOST_HAS_STDINT_H from getting defined, I 
> believe this will be either in boost/config/suffix.hpp:
>
> # if defined(__STDC_VERSION__) && (__STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901)
> # define BOOST_HAS_STDINT_H
> # endif
>
> or in boost/config/posix_features.hpp:
>
> // POSIX version 6 requires <stdint.h>
> # if defined(_POSIX_VERSION) && (_POSIX_VERSION >= 200100)
> # define BOOST_HAS_STDINT_H
> # endif

Thanks for  the suggestion.  It turns out that neither of these defines 
BOOST_HAS_STDINT_H, because __STDC_VERSION__ is not defined, and 
_POSIX_VERSION is 199506.

Also, boost/cstdint.hpp:85 is a #elif that ends the '#ifdef 
BOOST_HAS_STDINT_H' block, proving that BOOST_HAS_STDINT_H was not 
defined.  So I will just take Markus's suggestion to remove the __osf__ 
part of the test for my system.

I'll let you guys figure out whether you want to support old versions of 
Tru64 Unix like mine.

-- 
Dick Hadsell			914-259-6320  Fax: [phone]
Reply-to:			hadsell_at_[hidden]
Blue Sky Studios                http://www.blueskystudios.com
44 South Broadway, White Plains, NY 10601