From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-23 14:29:02
Deane Yang <deane_yang_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 06:04:20PM +0100, Joaqu?n M? L?pez Mu?oz wrote:
>>>Attached please find a little more stylish reformulation of the same idea.
>>>(bad thing is it looks too much like Tintin's "Destination Moon" rocket.)
>> What's wrong with that exactly? :-)
>> I still like that logo best. I think it could be improved by putting
>> "++" on the stripe, because the ring around the rocket looks like a "C"
> I find this one too static, compared to Dave's attempts.
> It does have the sense of solidity that some have asked for,
> but I'd rather have a more dynamic feel (which reflects, I think,
> more accurately what boost is. Much of boost is not for the
Thanks. Actually I thought that Joaquín's design was plenty dynamic
and better than mine on simplicity grounds. I do agree about the ring
and the ++. Put a little white gap between the rocket and the ring at
the intersection, and you've got your "C."
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk