Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-23 14:38:06

"Edward Diener" <eddielee_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>> "Edward Diener" <eddielee_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> This may be seen as a nitpick by I think the generalized one-line
>>> explanation for 'ref', as well as the text in the 'ref' introduction
>>> should say "passing reference parameters to generic functions"
>>> rather than "passing references to generic functions".
>> If I was going to add a word there, it would be "arguments," not
>> "parameters."
> I have never seen a good explanation of the difference between "parameters"
> or "arguments" when passing data to functions, but "arguments" seems equally
> as good. I just felt that the term "references to generic functions" does
> sound confusing since references must refer to something and the terminology
> makes it sound like it refers to generic functions rather than the types of
> data one passes to generic functions.

FYI, I no longer understand where the source for those docs are, so
someone else will have to make the change.

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at