From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-23 14:50:36
Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
> At 03:33 AM 11/23/2004, Daniel Wallin wrote:
> >> Is there a way for the user of the library to enforce a rule like "No
> >> positional param after named params" on a case by case basis?
> >I think we could implement something like that. I have to think about it
> >a little.
> It may be confusing to users if different uses of the library follow
> different rules. Is there a serious need for anything other than the
> conservative "No positional param after named params" rule? (That's
> the rule I'm used to.)
I have the same reaction (and question).
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk