[boost] Re: [Review] Named parameter questions

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-23 14:50:36

Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:

> At 03:33 AM 11/23/2004, Daniel Wallin wrote:
>
>  >> Is there a way for the user of the library to enforce a rule like "No
>  >> positional param after named params" on a case by case basis?
>  >
>  >I think we could implement something like that. I have to think about it
>  >a little.
>
> It may be confusing to users if different uses of the library follow
> different rules. Is there a serious need for anything other than the
> conservative "No positional param after named params" rule? (That's
> the rule I'm used to.)

I have the same reaction (and question).

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com