Boost logo

Boost :

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-23 13:03:53

At 03:33 AM 11/23/2004, Daniel Wallin wrote:

>> Is there a way for the user of the library to enforce a rule like "No
>> positional param after named params" on a case by case basis?
>I think we could implement something like that. I have to think about it
>a little.

It may be confusing to users if different uses of the library follow
different rules. Is there a serious need for anything other than the
conservative "No positional param after named params" rule? (That's the
rule I'm used to.)


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at