Re: [boost] Re: [Review] Named parameter questions

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-23 13:03:53

At 03:33 AM 11/23/2004, Daniel Wallin wrote:

 >> Is there a way for the user of the library to enforce a rule like "No
 >> positional param after named params" on a case by case basis?
 >
 >I think we could implement something like that. I have to think about it
 >a little.

It may be confusing to users if different uses of the library follow 
different rules. Is there a serious need for anything other than the 
conservative "No positional param after named params" rule? (That's the 
rule I'm used to.)

--Beman