[boost] Re: Logos - Last Minute Change of Heart

From: Daniel Frey (d.frey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-29 17:19:23

David Abrahams wrote:
> Daniel Frey wrote:
> 
>>>> Inspired by that, how about simply writing
>>>>
>>>>   std::Boost
>>>>
>>>> OK, select a nice font, colors, etc., but also the plain text 
>>>> representation is possible and IMHO communicates well where Boost 
>>>> aims at.
>>>
>>> Because it doesn't suggest that Boost leads to standardization the 
>>> way my submission does.
>>
>> Yours implies this theme, too
> 
> ??
> I know that mine implies the theme that Boost leads to standardization. 
>  I was claiming yours doesn't.

Oh, I misunderstood that. But why doesn't std::Boost imply that Boost 
libraries (at least some) aim to become part of the standard (that is 
namespace std::)? Or why is Boostd:: (given the colorized logo) better 
than std::Boost (logo or text)?

Regards, Daniel