From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-29 18:05:24
Daniel Frey wrote:
> Oh, I misunderstood that. But why doesn't std::Boost imply that Boost
> libraries (at least some) aim to become part of the standard (that is
> namespace std::)?
Because we read english text from left to right?
> Or why is Boostd:: (given the colorized logo) better
> than std::Boost (logo or text)?
#2, it's shorter.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk