From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-30 12:41:08
Rene Rivera wrote:
> Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:25:50AM -0600, Rene Rivera wrote:
>>> I think having a ranked vote would solve most problems. Let people
>>> make up to 3, or any other appropriate number, choices and rank them
>>> in order of preference. When tabulating the higher ranked choices get
>>> more points. And you add the points. The "winner" is the one with
>>> most points.
>> Right now, before your very eyes, watch the logo bicycle shed become
>> a voting system bicycle shed - tada! ;-)
> Such constructive criticism.
And in case you misunderstood, ranked voting is a standard voting
Some constructive criticism would be something like...
All this voting stuff is out of hand... It might be better to have well
known Boost persons judge the selection instead of giving a bunch of
random people who may not have a good idea of what Boost is about a
voice in the matter. For example we could say that the Boost admins
would do the judging.
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk