From: Stefan Slapeta (stefan_nospam__at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-12-13 18:08:32
John Maddock wrote:
> Following on from the recent discussion, we now have:
> BOOST_NO_IS_ABSTRACT added to the config system, this is likely to cause
> some new failures with config_test.cpp until we get the macro added to
> those compiler config files that need it (although Gcc, Visual C++,
> Borland C++ are already taken care of).
I didn't follow this discussion ... please could somebody write me two
sentences about how to make cw* pass again?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk