From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-12-14 07:55:57
>> BOOST_NO_IS_ABSTRACT added to the config system, this is likely to cause
>> some new failures with config_test.cpp until we get the macro added to
>> those compiler config files that need it (although Gcc, Visual C++,
>> Borland C++ are already taken care of).
> I didn't follow this discussion ... please could somebody write me two
> sentences about how to make cw* pass again?
is_abstract itself hasn't changed: did you mean the config_test test case?
If so I've just committed a fix to the config system for
Let me know if this doesn't take care of it,
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk