Boost logo

Boost :

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-12-14 07:55:57

>> BOOST_NO_IS_ABSTRACT added to the config system, this is likely to cause
>> some new failures with config_test.cpp until we get the macro added to
>> those compiler config files that need it (although Gcc, Visual C++,
>> Borland C++ are already taken care of).
> I didn't follow this discussion ... please could somebody write me two
> sentences about how to make cw* pass again?

is_abstract itself hasn't changed: did you mean the config_test test case?
If so I've just committed a fix to the config system for
Metrowerks/Sunpro/Intel compilers.

Let me know if this doesn't take care of it,



Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at