Re: [boost] Re: is_abstract update

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-12-14 07:55:57

>> BOOST_NO_IS_ABSTRACT added to the config system, this is likely to cause 
>> some new failures with config_test.cpp until we get the macro added to 
>> those compiler config files that need it (although Gcc, Visual C++, 
>> Borland C++ are already taken care of).
>>
>
> I didn't follow this discussion ... please could somebody write me two 
> sentences about how to make cw* pass again?

is_abstract itself hasn't changed: did you mean the config_test test case? 
If so I've just committed a fix to the config system for 
Metrowerks/Sunpro/Intel compilers.

Let me know if this doesn't take care of it,

Thanks,

John.