From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-12-15 13:20:12
Andras Erdei wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:30:55 -0700, Jonathan Turkanis
> <technews_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I agree with many of your points, except the main one: that
>> Boost.Rational with built-in intergal types is useless without
> if you are really, really convinced that this is the case,
That what is the case?
> there is a
> code snippet at http://www.ccg.hu/pub/src/rat.cpp -- it shows that
> the current finite precision boost::rational semantics can be
> implemented a lot more efficiently
Thank you. I'll take a careful look at it as soon as I am a little less far
behind on my current projects.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk