Re: [boost] Re: Re: Re: Re: rational with finite precision

From: Andras Erdei (aerdei_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-12-15 15:50:58

On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:20:12 -0700, Jonathan Turkanis
<technews_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> >> I agree with many of your points, except the main one: that
> >> Boost.Rational with built-in intergal types is useless without
> >> rounding.
> >
> > if you are really, really convinced that this is the case,...
> 
> That what is the case?

sorry: that rational with the current (non-rounding) finite semantics
is o.k. for some purpose
 
> I'll take a careful look at it as soon as I am a little less far
> behind on my current projects.

ok, let me know what you think when you have checked;
also, when i have time, i'll try to extend it a bit more

br,
andras