Boost logo

Boost :

From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-12-20 19:33:03

On 12/8/04 3:23 AM, "Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> The proposed course of action is documented in:
> Now:
> 1. Are there any objections?

Yes. I'm looking at:

Yeah, I think that's possible. So I'm going to:

1. put new header to boost/detail
2. put new source to libs/detail/utf
3. #include new source in program_options.

I don't think any #include to the "libs" directory is a good idea. It works
only if an expanded Boost archive stays as-is. If the sub-directories are
scattered, e.g. to meet Unix header placements, then the idea fails. I
think some existing code tries to #include "libs," that code should be
changed. This could be a further argument to finally move mandatory source
files to a distinct root-level directory.

> 2. Who does it? I can do it soon. Robert, what do you think?

Daryle Walker
Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie
darylew AT hotmail DOT com

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at