From: Marcelo E. Magallon (mmagallo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-12-26 22:31:31
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 10:42:13AM -0500, David Abrahams wrote:
> The only real problem now is that there are a plethora of different
> build / configuration systems out there. Should BBv2 try to cater to
> each one? We could generate pkg-config files in addition to
> Jamfiles, oh and we could generate Makefiles and autoconf files and
> Visual Studio Projects and Metrowerks projects and...
I do get your point ...
... but I think it's necessary to say that autoconf has support for
pkg-config and Makefile support for pkg-config is trivial. So in the
particular case of Unix and Unix-like builds (not using BBv2)
pkg-config support is enough is enough to address its needs.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk