|
Boost : |
From: Caleb Epstein (caleb.epstein_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-03 23:51:33
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 12:46:07 -0500, christopher diggins
<cdiggins_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> That is close, but the method forwarded to may or may not be virtual. I
> don't know how the gnu gcc signatures worked, I have only heard second-hand
> that it was a similar technique. There is an article at
> http://www.codeproject.com/cpp/retrofitpolymorphism2.asp which explains how
> the technique works using double-width pointers. There was also an article
> on it, in the September 2004 issue of the C/C++ Users Journal.
I just have to say that I continue to be astounded by the elegant and
useful ideas and code that people on this list come up with on a
regular basis. So here are some words of appreciation.
Wow! This is neat!
Happy New Year Boosters. Thanks for making C++ more fun!
-- Caleb Epstein caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk