|
Boost : |
From: Simon Barner (barner_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-06 18:47:53
Robert Ramey wrote:
> Very helpful.
>
> Is there any chance you can upload the test results to the test matrix?
How would I do it? Sorry, I couldn't find it in the Boost documentation.
In the meantime, the regression tests for FreeBSD 5.3 have completed
(basically, it's nothing but launching run_tests.sh and waiting until it
completes, right?).
I have uploaded the test results here, but I can submit them at the
proper place later.
http://home.leo.org/~barner/boost/FreeBSD-5.3/
The tests for FreeBSD 4.11-RC1 are soon to come!
[...]
> The serialization library consists of 2 libraries: serialization and
> wserialization. wserialization implements those facilities which depend on
> wide characters. The failure of wserialization to built for lack of wide
> character support does not inhibit the usage of the library where wide
> characters are not needed.
>
> It turns out that there are number of libraries/compiler combinations which
> fail to support wide characters or have some problem with them. In these
> cases the wserialization library will fail to build and the corresponding
> tests fail to run for lack of a library. So this change should be
> unnecessary. Furthermore , there are combination which might miight work -
> for example gcc 3.42(or 2.85) + STLPort so the Jamfile should be left to
> permit these to be run and tested.
>
> To summarize, the jamfile should be set up to permit an attempt to build
> both libraries. If wserialization fails to build, it indicates that that
> part of the library cannot be used. However, there's no reason the rest
> can' t be used and tested.
I think that I introduced the patch because the wserialization library
cause the entire build process to terminate, which might or might not
be the FreeBSD ports collection's fault. I'll verify this later!
Simon
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk