From: Simon Barner (barner_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-06 19:01:07
Caleb Epstein wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 03:07:38 +0100, Simon Barner <barner_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > -SUFDLL ?= .so ;
> > +SUFDLL ?= .so.2 ;
> As of Boost 1.32.0, the shared libraries are properly versioned (e.g.
> they have a proper SONAME attribute set and there is a
> libboost_XXX.so.1.32.0). Is this change necessary then?
Probably still, yes, because as far as I understand FreeBSD's shared
library naming scheme is not compatible to your policy:
But this patch is very specific to the ports collection (in order to
meet the strict rules that were set up to maintain a software build system for
12k+ applications and libraries -- for people who are building Boost directly
from source, your naming convention looks good to me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk