From: Caleb Epstein (caleb.epstein_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-07 00:08:18
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:01:07 +0100, Simon Barner <barner_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Caleb Epstein wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 03:07:38 +0100, Simon Barner <barner_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > > -SUFDLL ?= .so ;
> > > +SUFDLL ?= .so.2 ;
> > As of Boost 1.32.0, the shared libraries are properly versioned (e.g.
> > they have a proper SONAME attribute set and there is a
> > libboost_XXX.so.1.32.0). Is this change necessary then?
> Probably still, yes, because as far as I understand FreeBSD's shared
y naming scheme is not compatible to your policy:
The first words on that page are:
"If you are adding shared library support to a port or other piece
that *does not have one*"
Emphasis mine. Boost has one, so why this patch?
-- Caleb Epstein caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk