Re: [boost] Re: Interesting Boost Implementation Details?

From: Michael Walter (michael.walter_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-10 02:29:13

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:09:55 +0800, Joel <djowel_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> In a link that you provided:
> 
>      http://wombat.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc/foldoc.cgi?curried+function
> 
> it is defined as:
> 
> A function of N arguments that is considered as a function of one
> argument which returns another function of N-1 arguments.
> 
> IMHO, sticking strictly to this definition is pedantic.
It seems pretty good and concise to me (also stressing the point that
curried functions are unary functions).

- Michael