[boost] Re: Interesting Boost Implementation Details?

From: Joel (djowel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-10 04:43:36

Michael Walter wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:09:55 +0800, Joel <djowel_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
>>In a link that you provided:
>>
>>     http://wombat.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc/foldoc.cgi?curried+function
>>
>>it is defined as:
>>
>>A function of N arguments that is considered as a function of one
>>argument which returns another function of N-1 arguments.
>>
>>IMHO, sticking strictly to this definition is pedantic.
> 
> It seems pretty good and concise to me (also stressing the point that
> curried functions are unary functions).

Ok, I'll have to agree with you and Dave. Let's keep the terms straight.
Here's an update to the docs:

    http://tinyurl.com/3khbu

Thanks!

Regards,
-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net