From: Joel (djowel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-10 04:43:36
Michael Walter wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:09:55 +0800, Joel <djowel_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>In a link that you provided:
>>it is defined as:
>>A function of N arguments that is considered as a function of one
>>argument which returns another function of N-1 arguments.
>>IMHO, sticking strictly to this definition is pedantic.
> It seems pretty good and concise to me (also stressing the point that
> curried functions are unary functions).
Ok, I'll have to agree with you and Dave. Let's keep the terms straight.
Here's an update to the docs:
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk