|
|
Boost : |
From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-31 21:10:43
Gennadiy Rozental writes:
> I noticed that in some places we are using extra namespace for
> protection from unintended ADL.
It would help the discussion if you pinpointed these particular
places. The answers below are MPL-specific.
> Is there any rationale for:
>
> 1. Why we need that?
See http://www.mail-archive.com/boost@lists.boost.org/msg01741.html
and http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/90627.
> 2. Why namely this solution is prefered?
It's the only known way to resolve the issue.
> 3. In which case we need to do so?
See the links above.
-- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk