Boost logo

Boost :

From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-01 05:16:28

Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> You don't need 'typeof' for that kind of syntax sugar; a standard
> compliant compiler will suffice, see

Oh, that's very nice. I guess it could work on more compilers now as
well. I think using 'typeof' has a few small advantages (lets you use
operators, possibly faster compile times and maybe nicer error messages)
but that looks much better.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at