From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-01 03:53:40
Robert Ramey writes:
> Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
>> Robert Ramey writes:
>> The above assumes that *the main trunk* is in the good state, and
>> it's not --
> actually it assumes this the main trunk can be brought to a good
> state in a relatively short time like 10 days.
That's what I meant.
> I don't believe the number of red squares is an accurate reflection
> of the state and how much work there is to do.
I'd say it's proven to be pretty accurate (excluding the extreme
cases when everything is red due to Boost-wide or
> Many of these problems have a common cause.
Across all the libraries?
Note that currently the reports are missing a significant share of
(our) Win32 toolsets which will definitely add more colors to the
> In at least one case, there's a new compiler which wasn't
> tested at 1.32 at all.
Which one? If it wasn't tested with 1.32, it shouldn't appear as a
> I believe that a new release have improvements over
> the current one and have no regressions.
If you meant "should have", I agree 100%.
-- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk