|
Boost : |
From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-02 20:04:37
Daniel Wallin wrote:
> Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
>> Do you have any suggestions for improving the macro syntax? For
>> instance, do you like David Abrahams's suggested syntax better:
>>
>> DECLARE_INTERFACE(
>> Interface,
>> ((int)(print)(ostream&)(int))
>> );
>>
>> ?
>
> Here's two other ideas (that I *think* are implementable):
>
> DECLARE_INTERFACE(Interface,
> 2(int, print, (ostream&, int))
> );
>
> DECLARE_INTERFACE(Interface,
> (int, print, 2(ostream&, int))
> );
This is a bit like Rene's, with 'ARGn' replaced by plain 'n'.
If I could just get rid of that damned arity everything would be great!
Jonathan
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk