[boost] Re: Template-based BIL IDL

From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-02 20:04:37

Daniel Wallin wrote:
> Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
>> Do you have any suggestions for improving the macro syntax? For
>> instance, do you like David Abrahams's suggested syntax better:
>>
>>     DECLARE_INTERFACE(
>>       Interface,
>>       ((int)(print)(ostream&)(int))
>>     );
>>
>> ?
>
> Here's two other ideas (that I *think* are implementable):
>
>      DECLARE_INTERFACE(Interface,
>        2(int, print, (ostream&, int))
>      );
>
>      DECLARE_INTERFACE(Interface,
>        (int, print, 2(ostream&, int))
>      );

This is a bit like Rene's, with 'ARGn' replaced by plain 'n'.

If I could just get rid of that damned arity everything would be great!

Jonathan