From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-03 09:47:12
"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Daniel Wallin wrote:
>> Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
>>> Do you have any suggestions for improving the macro syntax? For
>>> instance, do you like David Abrahams's suggested syntax better:
>> Here's two other ideas (that I *think* are implementable):
>> 2(int, print, (ostream&, int))
>> (int, print, 2(ostream&, int))
> This is a bit like Rene's, with 'ARGn' replaced by plain 'n'.
> If I could just get rid of that damned arity everything would be great!
(int, print, (ostream&)(int))
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk