From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-03 23:22:22
Walter Landry wrote:
> David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> no OSL (http://osl.iu.edu)
> One possibility would be to have OSL just host a CVS server,
> and see whether that clears up most of the problems.
I think passing up an opportunity to migrate to SVN would be
contrary to the spirit of Boost being a cutting-edge community.
It's not like it's a gratuitous switch with no obvious benefits.
I think anybody who's taken a look at SVN can see that there are
definitely improvements over CVS.
To be honest with you, taking a look at what is available in the
Java world, I have to say that the C++ community is working in
the Stone Age still. It needs every leg up it can get.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk