Re: [boost] Re: [boost.range] RFC on small updates

From: John Torjo (john.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-04 03:51:58

Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> | > iterator_range& operator++();
> | > value_type& operator*() const;
> |
> | I'm all for it :)
> | Out of curiosity, will you have ++pre and post++?
> 
> I only thought of ++pre.
> 

If you offer ++pre, I see no reason not to offer post++ as well.

Best,
John

-- 
John Torjo,    Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal
-- "Win32 GUI Generics" -- generics & GUI do mix, after all
-- http://www.torjo.com/win32gui/ -v1.6.3 (Resource Splitter)
-- http://www.torjo.com/cb/ - Click, Build, Run!