Re: [boost] Two alined_storage classes in the CVS

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-04 11:18:33

Joaquín Mª López Muñoz wrote:
> Peter Dimov ha escrito:
>
>> In my opinion, the older version needs to be removed entirely and the
>> libraries should be updated to use the TR1 version of
>> aligned_storage.
>
> The problem is that the older aligned_storage provides a different
> functionality than the std::tr1 (it gives you uninitialized aligned
> stack space.) It is a mere accident that both classes are named the
> same IMHO.

I think that the two classes provide the same functionality (albeit in a 
slightly different way) and I don't believe that this is accidental.