From: Kevin Wheatley (hxpro_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-04 11:52:28
Jason Hise wrote:
> My question may be naive, because I have no idea what the TR is, but
> what would be the problem with putting all of the TR code in a boost::tr
> namespace? Are there pieces of the tr already in use?
The latest(?) draft of the C++ Standard Library Technical Report is
See the discussion on TR1 =>
Some of tr1:: already is in boost:: (and originated there) just with
slightly differing details which is the point of the tr1:: versions
being worked upon in the CVS.
-- | Kevin Wheatley, Cinesite (Europe) Ltd | Nobody thinks this | | Senior Technology | My employer for certain | | And Network Systems Architect | Not even myself |
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk