From: Daniel Frey (d.frey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-06 06:06:39
Martin Slater wrote:
> Can anyone comment on whether the branching has got better in svn? In
> particular (Quoting from
> Here's the real killer blow for me:
> Subversion doesn't keep track of what merges have been applied to a
> file. That's up to you to keep track of somehow. That means that for
> every file (or set of files), you have to know up to what revision
> they've been integrated, and only pull in the changes from that revision
> on. [...Double quote deleted...]
> This appears to be very limiting if you rely heavily on branching.
Is that any worse than the current situation with CVS? If not, it's not
a problem IMHO.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk