From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-06 11:55:29
At Sunday 2005-02-06 03:16, you wrote:
>>The SVN book, if I recall correctly, does mention this case. Their
>>solution is to always comment merge transactions so that you can look
>>at the history and identify them. Whether that is impractical for
>>Boost or not, I can't say.
>Ok, thanks. Possibly something to bear in mind then, this was the major
>killer for us using svn at work as we intend to rely very heavily on
>branching for our day to day work on our upcoming project.
IIUC, cvsnt has a feature (called mergepoints) which automates tracking for
you and eliminates the requirement for all those pesky tags to track merges.
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk