From: Matt Hurd (matt.hurd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-10 16:47:02
> Michael Glassford <glassfordm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Preston A. Elder wrote:
> > Is there any fantastically good reason why there is no way of getting a
> > count of how many threads are being handled by a thread_group?
> > Obviously, I could write my own thread_group, but I can think of no reason
> > for boost's thread_group to not have a count() method.
> I don't see one either. I'll look into adding one.
Keeping the count correct in the face of exceptions or other
cancellations may have some consequences...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk