Re: [boost] Re: thread_group.count()?

From: Matt Hurd (matt.hurd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-10 16:47:02

> Michael Glassford <glassfordm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Preston A. Elder wrote:
> > Is there any fantastically good reason why there is no way of getting a
> > count of how many threads are being handled by a thread_group?
> >
<snip> 
> > Obviously, I could write my own thread_group, but I can think of no reason
> > for boost's thread_group to not have a count() method.
> >
> 
> I don't see one either. I'll look into adding one.

Keeping the count correct in the face of exceptions or other
cancellations may have some consequences...

matt.