Boost logo

Boost :

From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-14 21:38:22

Larry Evans wrote:
> On 02/14/2005 06:48 PM, Joel de Guzman wrote:
>> benchmarks would not be immediately necessary. Please see my
>> other post: "Fusion plan".
> I searched for "Fusion plan" in subject, but that showed nothing.
> Then I looked at all of your posts for the last month, but none
> looked promising.
> Could you give more details so I can find it?

I just posted it. You should see it by now. If not:

Here's what I am planning:

1) I intend to refactor fusion to allow different forms of
    containers with varying characteristics. I plan to have:
    a) vector
    b) list
    c) set
    d) map
2) The unifying force is the (as usual): iterator
3) There will be intrinsic functions that work on specific
    containers (e.g. cons for lists; thus having full backward
    compatibility with old tuples).
4) As I intend to follow the MPL mold, I will follow MPL
    naming convention (e.g. "at" instead of "get", vector
    instead of tuple).
5) Provide a tuple TR1 interface on top of fusion.
6) Provide a backward compatible interface (for old tuples) on
    top of fusion.

I'd like to hear your thoughts.

Joel de Guzman

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at