From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-14 23:31:37
On 02/14/2005 07:38 PM, Joel de Guzman wrote:
> Larry Evans wrote:
>> Could you give more details so I can find it?
> I just posted it. You should see it by now. If not:
I see it.
> Here's what I am planning:
> 1) I intend to refactor fusion to allow different forms of
> containers with varying characteristics. I plan to have:
> a) vector
> b) list
> c) set
> d) map
> 4) As I intend to follow the MPL mold, I will follow MPL
> naming convention (e.g. "at" instead of "get", vector
> instead of tuple).
I'm confused because an instance of mpl::vector<T1,T2,...,Tn> contains
no data but an instance of a tuple<T1,T2,...,Tn> contains an instance of
T1,T2,...,Tn. Aren't both needed?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk