[boost] Re: tuple patch (constructing from a pair)

From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-14 23:31:37

On 02/14/2005 07:38 PM, Joel de Guzman wrote:
> Larry Evans wrote:
[snip]
>> Could you give more details so I can find it?
> I just posted it. You should see it by now. If not:
I see it.
> 
> Here's what I am planning:
> 
> 1) I intend to refactor fusion to allow different forms of
>    containers with varying characteristics. I plan to have:
>    a) vector
>    b) list
>    c) set
>    d) map
[snip]
> 4) As I intend to follow the MPL mold, I will follow MPL
>    naming convention (e.g. "at" instead of "get", vector
>    instead of tuple).
I'm confused because an instance of mpl::vector<T1,T2,...,Tn> contains 
no data but an instance of a tuple<T1,T2,...,Tn> contains an instance of 
T1,T2,...,Tn.  Aren't both needed?