[boost] Re: [indirect container] RFC on naming of library and classes

From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-16 08:47:04

|If you plan to extend the lib as outlined in the "future work" section
|to cope with pointer-like objects like shared_ptr (an maybe iterators?)
|then indirect_xxx would fit better, though ptr_xxx is evocative enough.
|Just my 2 cents, anyway.

The first release will not consider the extension with shared_ptr. If people
really want it, we should consider it for a second release.

what do you mean by "and maybe iterators"?

-Thorsten