Boost logo

Boost :

From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-18 09:45:16

David B. Held wrote:
> Rob Stewart wrote:
>> From: "David B. Held" <dheld_at_[hidden]>
>>> One thing I would like to say is, my only reluctance on the part
>>> of some of the logos is that while they are quite beautiful, they
>>> have too many colors to know what they would look like as a small
>>> icon.
>> While there is mention of optionally supply iconic versions of
>> the submitted logo, suitability to an icon was not part of the
>> requirements. Is it fair to change the requirements now,
>> especially given that there is a prize waiting for the winner?
>> (You can certainly vote with icons in mind if you like, but that
>> doesn't make it fair.)
> Well, I'm not stating it as a requirement. I'm stating it as my
> personal preference. And the whole question of "fairness" in voting
> is a can of worms that we probably don't want to get into. Doubtless
> other people feel differently about the logos than I do and will
> reflect that in their own vote.

Fair enough.


Joel de Guzman

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at