Boost logo

Boost :

From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-18 09:39:27

Rob Stewart wrote:
> From: "David B. Held" <dheld_at_[hidden]>
>>One thing I would like to say is, my only reluctance on the part
>>of some of the logos is that while they are quite beautiful, they
>>have too many colors to know what they would look like as a small
> While there is mention of optionally supply iconic versions of
> the submitted logo, suitability to an icon was not part of the
> requirements. Is it fair to change the requirements now,
> especially given that there is a prize waiting for the winner?
> (You can certainly vote with icons in mind if you like, but that
> doesn't make it fair.)

No, it isn't fair. The requirements are clear. Supplying an
iconic version is not part of the requirement. And no, it's
not fair and it's too late to change the requirements now.


Joel de Guzman

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at