Boost logo

Boost :

From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-27 14:53:55

"JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z" <joaquin_at_[hidden]> wrote in message

> Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> > I think tr components should be allowed special status. What's
> the point in
> > putting tr components through a normal review, when there can be
> no interface
> > changes?

| As for my negative vote to accepting Boost.Unordered for
| fasttrack, my main concern is that other authors are patiently
| standing in line for their own reviews, and the size and scope
| of this library does not justify for a fasttrack treatment, in
| my humble opinion. Other than that I think the lib is needed
| and will eventually make it into Boost.

IMO any TR compliant component should be allowed into boost without any
major review. It's already been through a major year-long review in the
standard committee.

If some brilliant mind would like to submit a new and different hash-container
to boost with
more policies and stuff, then he can still do it. That doesn't mean we should
have the tr
components. Some people have actually spend a lot of time to implement this
they deserve a fast track-review, so we can all start using it.

As for the review queue, then we went by for moths without reviews. I'll
suggest that we'll
try to avoid that instead.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at