From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-28 03:53:07
"Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto_at_[hidden]> writes:
> "JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z" <joaquin_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>> > I think tr components should be allowed special status. What's
>> the point in
>> > putting tr components through a normal review, when there can be
>> no interface
>> > changes?
> | As for my negative vote to accepting Boost.Unordered for
> | fasttrack, my main concern is that other authors are patiently
> | standing in line for their own reviews, and the size and scope
> | of this library does not justify for a fasttrack treatment, in
> | my humble opinion. Other than that I think the lib is needed
> | and will eventually make it into Boost.
> IMO any TR compliant component should be allowed into boost without any
> major review. It's already been through a major year-long review in the
> standard committee.
As far as I'm concerned, the test suite for a TR component is the most
important part of any submission that implements it. The test suite
deserves careful scrutiny. Maybe not two weeks of scrutiny, but
probably a week.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk