From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-28 15:10:43
Rob Stewart wrote:
> Here are some comments on what I see thus far:
> #21 I don't think pushing the "C" up so high is beneficial.
> "boost" is too far below the "C." Either lower the "C" so more
> is in the image, or just close the gap.
Sorry I didn't notice this comment earlier.
This one was inspired by Erik Wien's early sketches. I don't really like it
anymore; I prefer #29.
> #68 ... Instead of "C++ | The next chapter"
> ... how about "C++ on Steroids?"
I like it! See entry 88. (I misspelled "steroids")
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk