From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-01 13:31:25
David Abrahams wrote:
> Okay, we have to fix that. This is just confusing.
> I really thought we had already decided that there was no reason to
> post two different result formats. Is there any reason to keep the
> non-metacomm format up there?
Right now it's the only way for me to get current Linux results, since the
meta-comm linux results for iostreams are a month old. I've posted a number of
messages to the testing list, starting at least three weeks ago, but the problem
has not been fixed and I haven't even discovered if the problem is on Martin's
end, meta-comm's end, or both.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk