From: Andreas Huber (ahd6974-spamgroupstrap_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-03 13:16:48
Andreas Huber wrote:
>> I don't think of exiting a state as
>> destroying it, just that it's no longer "active" or whatever.
> Also, think of a state being
> represented by one bit. Zero means state is inactive, 1 means state
> is active. With state-local storage you can augment this one bit with
> whatever information you like.
Of course, this does not explain why the variables need to be
constructed on state entry and destructed on state-exit. So, in the
context of this discussion this is nonsense.
-- Andreas Huber When replying by private email, please remove the words spam and trap from the address shown in the header.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk