From: Iain K. Hanson (ikh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-06 06:50:30
Dave Abrahams wrote:
> Or maybe more people
> should be voting for it on the *condition* that an option with fast
> dispatch must be available. I must say, in a world replete with
> high-performance generic components, I agree that "Boost FSM" is too
> broad to cover a library that only does dynamic double-dispatch.
Personnally, in its current shape I wouldn't vote for this library as
an element of an FSM lib. But, there is something that I find really
funcky that Andreas has discovered. That you can scale FSMs by spliting
them across compilation units in user code
I'd love to see a DSL ( Domain Specific Language ) for state charts that
generated Alexsey style FSMs with states able to be defined in seperate
compilation units. This would solve the scaleabilty problems.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk