From: Alexander Nasonov (alnsn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-06 11:29:21
Iain K. Hanson wrote:
> I'd love to see a DSL ( Domain Specific Language ) for state charts that
> generated Alexsey style FSMs with states able to be defined in seperate
> compilation units. This would solve the scaleabilty problems.
If you're talking about this
then there is nothing to put in separate TUs because states are numbers.
Probably, you mixed states up with transitions.
This is more a problem of proposed Boost.FSM then yours. In my opition,
too many things are put in state definition and too much a user has to
1 curiously recurring template pattern
2 forward declaration of events
3 state context
4 transitions and other reactions
5 other advanced features (only for advanced user)
I think some of them should be defined somewhere else.
-- Alexander Nasonov
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk