RE: [boost] Re: [optional] new assignmet semantic and references

From: Brock Peabody (brock.peabody_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-06 11:06:16

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]
> On Behalf Of Joel de Guzman

> >>
> >>FWIW, a tuple<T&> can't be re-bound.
> >
> >
> > True, but neither can a tuple<T&> be null.
> 
> Oops, I missed this. Ahem, I don't see the connection of
> being nullable and being rebindable. Are you trying to say
> that being nullable requires it to be rebindable too? I
> think these are two different things.

That's what I was trying to say but I agree with you now that being nullable
doesn't imply being rebindable.

Regards,
Brock