[boost] Re: FSM Review

From: Pavel Vozenilek (pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-06 11:05:33

"Alexander Nasonov" wrote:

> This is more a problem of proposed Boost.FSM then yours. In my opition,
> too many things are put in state definition and too much a user has to
> remember:
>
> 1 curiously recurring template pattern
> 2 forward declaration of events
> 3 state context
> 4 transitions and other reactions
> 5 other advanced features (only for advanced user)
>
> I think some of them should be defined somewhere else.
>
>
Would you mind to write review or just list of problems
and whether/how they can be solved?

I am prepared to wait for opinions after review period ends.

What role do you see for your system from:
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/boost/2176732
?

/Pavel