From: Pavel Vozenilek (pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-06 11:05:33
"Alexander Nasonov" wrote:
> This is more a problem of proposed Boost.FSM then yours. In my opition,
> too many things are put in state definition and too much a user has to
> 1 curiously recurring template pattern
> 2 forward declaration of events
> 3 state context
> 4 transitions and other reactions
> 5 other advanced features (only for advanced user)
> I think some of them should be defined somewhere else.
Would you mind to write review or just list of problems
and whether/how they can be solved?
I am prepared to wait for opinions after review period ends.
What role do you see for your system from:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk