From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-08 22:33:26
"Eric Niebler" <eric_at_[hidden]> writes:
> A lot of people are expressing favorable opinions about selection 67
> boost/squares. This logo is simply out of the question, in my opinion,
> because of its glaring similarity to the marketing imagery of Visual
> Studio. Just look at the Visual C++ box:
> IMO, option 67 should be removed.
I consider that a background pattern and not sacrosanct. I never
would have noticed it had you not pointed it out.
I think if we had to eliminate any abstract graphic that was used in
promotional or packaging material, there'd be hardly anything we could
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk