Boost logo

Boost :

From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-08 22:51:30

David Abrahams wrote:
> "Eric Niebler" <eric_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> A lot of people are expressing favorable opinions about selection 67
>> boost/squares. This logo is simply out of the question, in my
>> opinion, because of its glaring similarity to the marketing imagery
>> of Visual Studio. Just look at the Visual C++ box:
>> IMO, option 67 should be removed.
> I consider that a background pattern and not sacrosanct. I never
> would have noticed it had you not pointed it out.
> I think if we had to eliminate any abstract graphic that was used in
> promotional or packaging material, there'd be hardly anything we could
> use.

If it was used on the packaging of baby formula I might agree with you. Having a
logo that's so similar to to VC++ marketing material would be a real problem,


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at